On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 00:22 -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Steven Dake <[email protected]> wrote:
>         On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 10:15 +0200, Wojtek Meler wrote:
>         > Steven Dake pisze:
>         > > At one time Solaris worked, but nobody has done a re-port
>         in the
>         > > community since we moved to automake.  I attempted to
>         install Solaris
>         > > x86 in a KVM virtual machine and it just locks up on
>         startup.
>         > >
>         > Solaris 10 is usable in both vmware player and virtualbox.
>         If someone
>         > want to I can send 14KB vmware image
>         > which one can run under free vmware player an install
>         solaris on it
>         > (these images generated with easyvmx.com hanged up).
>         > > If anyone else has a solaris machine to try out porting it
>         would be
>         > > helpful.  I would really prefer 1.0 works with Solaris.
>         > >
>         >
>         > I could help with the code and take care of packaging it to
>         opencsw, but
>         > I'm not familiar with build system (auto*),
>         > so if someone could try make linking more portable
>         (libtool?), so trunk
>         > would compile both on linux and solaris it would be great.
>         >
>         
>         
>         Alot of developers with commit access have problems with
>         libtool which
>         is why we don't use it.
>         
>         I have a new 64 bit workstation coming in 3-5 days and will
>         then be able
>         to install a 64 bit f11 os which apparently works with Solaris
>         as a
>         guest KVM.  I should be able to beat the build and make
>         problems into
>         shape then.
>         
>         Regards
>         -steve
>         
>         
>         > Regards,
>         > Wojtek
>         
> 
>  
> Wojtek,
> 
> Update here,
> 
> All of those linking flags are gcc-isms and not supported by the
> native Solaris compiler.  The source buildling errors, not sure on,
> I'll have to read the headers and figure out the changes.
> 
> I received my workstation and have solaris 10 installed in a VM now.
> I installed a whole bunch of csw packages including gcc 4 toolchain.
> 
> Being a Solaris novice, I assume we would prefer the software to build
> under Solaris Sun Studio 12 rather then gcc4 (reading csw guidelines,
> it appears csw would prefer this)?
> 
> We use some gcc-isms which may or may not be supported in Sun Studio.
> I will have to compile a test program to find out with the Solaris
> compiler.  Specifically we use function constructors with the
> __attribute__(constructor) construct.  We also need the linker to
> support lazy linking (ie no compile-time link, but try to resolve
> symbols at runtime) which it probably does.
> 
> Downloading Sun Studio 12 now.  I'll let you know once I have
> something that builds, then I'll send out separate patch with
> something that works :)
> 
> Regards
> -steve

Using Solaris 10 I get "Compiler error: Wasted space" with the Sun
Studio 12 tools after hacking on the code a bit to get it to build
properly.  There was a bz opened on it in Feb and closed/dup to a bug
that I don't have permissions to.

Any tips?

Regards
-steve

> 
> 
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Openais mailing list
>         [email protected]
>         https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
>         
> 

_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to