I dont think the first if (!known_node) check is needed at all. It should always result in a true comparison.
Otherwise looks good for commit regards -steve On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:38 +0200, Jan Friesse wrote: > Second version of patch. It tests if we should deliver message inside of > cpd cycle. It fixes problem, where restarted node can get message from > (for that node) unknown node. > > Regards, > Honza > > Steven Dake wrote: > > Honzaf, > > > > Does this patch fix a specific test case? > > > > Regards > > -steve > > > > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 16:55 +0200, Jan Friesse wrote: > >> Currently, messages are delivered to application without testing, if we > >> know the node (this means, we have no process info about from that node). > >> > >> Following patch fixes that. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Openais mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais > > > _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
