Fabio M. Di Nitto pisze:
> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:55 +0200, Wojtek Meler wrote:
>   
>> Fabio M. Di Nitto pisze:
>>     
>>> testcpg is not endian clean. That's why you see them backwards.
>>>   
>>>       
>> I thought that corosync handles endianess in corosync daemon, and 
>> clients - like testcpg -
>> don't need to worry about it. Is it true?
>>     
>
> No it´s not true. neither corosync or associated libraries have any idea
> of what kind of data you are transmitting over the wire. They can't
> randomly swab stuff around.
>
>   
Sure, I was not clear - what I ment is services loaded in corosync 
daemon (like service_cpg.lcrso)
handles endianess in their messages sent over the wire, but client 
libraries (libcpg,so)
that communicate over coroipcc don't.
Messages from processes that are in CPG group are not touched (different 
layer).

If it is not I completely misunderstood corosync architecture.

Regards,
Wojtek
_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to