On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:16 +0100, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote:
> Steven Dake wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Our short term release plans for Corosync (flatiron).
> > 
> > Nov 25 - 1.1.3 - current bug fixes (including Angus's Coverity scan
> > results)
> > 
> > after 1.1.3 - stats patch stream merged into flatiron
> > 
> > Dec 15 - 1.2.0 - statistics patch stream, SAM service, totemsrp scaling
> > tested to atleast 48 physical nodes, stretch goal of resolving Dave's
> > issues with cpg config change information
> > 
> > after 1.2.0 (flatiron) is released our datasheet will be updated to
> > reflect new features.
> > 
> > If you have pending patches for the 1.1.3 release that have not been
> > reviewed or merged, please resubmit them.
> > 
> > If you have pending patches for 1.2.0 please work to get them finalized
> > and merged by December 11th.
> 
> The only 3 things I have "pending" for 1.2.0 is distro-agnostic init
> script, improvements to logsys and switching to libtool for linking.
> 
> The init script is pretty straight forward as it´s no more no less a
> copy of what we have for cman, stripped down to a bare minimum.
> 
> The logsys changes is something we started spec´ing a while ago, but I
> don´t think a month work can achieve that (mostly I don´t have enough
> resources to dedicate to that kind of improvements). Maybe it´s 2.0
> material.
> 

Lets push this to 1.3

> The libtool stuff is "straight forward" changes, but they will require
> testing across all supported platforms (that I don´t have).
> 

We could introduce this in 1.2, but without a patch to work with, its
pretty difficult to commit to atm.  I don't have expertise to do the
work.  If you take it on, I can test on all the arches.


> Steven, if you can please tell me what´s your opinion on logsys and
> libtool changes, then we can prioritize them differently if strictly
> required. At least corosync-fplay needs a little fix to handle files in
> different locations.
> 

ya we can make this change for 1.2 if you have time to address it.  I'm
pretty much consumed with current commitments.

> For the init script, I´ll try to send you a new one soon.
> 

Do you mean replace generic, or redhat init script in distribution?
Send me new one and we can replace "generic".  I am really loathe to
replace "redhat" with a complete rewrite.  The model we have is distros
take "generic" hack it for their distro specific needs, and hopefully
submit it back upstream for inclusion in the init directory for their
distro.

Regards
-steve

> Fabio
> 




_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to