On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:55:01PM -0800, Hunny Bunny wrote:
> Could somebody please advise me which distributed FS OCFS2
> or GFS2 is better to use for independently accessing shared MySQL, SVN
> and other databases and data storages on three node cluster with a
> future possibility to extend the cluster to five or ten nodes?
I say ocfs2. Of course, I work on it, so I would say that,
wouldn't I? ;-) Seriously, ocfs2 is very robust and tested, especially
on the enterprise distributions.
I want to be clear, both gfs2 and ocfs2 are shared-disk
filesystems. They are not "distributed" filesystems, in that they
require the shared disk and are not network filesystems. You may
already know this, but I just wanted to be clear.
Joel
--
"Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end."
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (650) 506-8127
_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
