On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:49:32AM +0100, Jan Friesse wrote:
> Included is forward ported 2096. In Whitetank without similar patch, GFS  
> can have problems with non-existing locks. I'm pretty sure, same problem  
> can happen be in cluster3, without this patch.
>
> Regards,
>   Honza
>

ACK.

> commit c9e3dbd597daedb2c010c347210fbd8732347d02
> Author: Jan Friesse <[email protected]>
> Date:   Fri Jan 15 11:43:30 2010 +0100
> 
>     Forward port of Whitetank 2096
> 
> diff --git a/trunk/services/ckpt.c b/trunk/services/ckpt.c
> index 7e5f713..1f350ef 100644
> --- a/trunk/services/ckpt.c
> +++ b/trunk/services/ckpt.c
> @@ -492,15 +492,15 @@ static struct corosync_lib_handler ckpt_lib_engine[] =
>       },
>       { /* 14 */
>               .lib_handler_fn         = 
> message_handler_req_lib_ckpt_sectioniterationinitialize,
> -             .flow_control           = COROSYNC_LIB_FLOW_CONTROL_NOT_REQUIRED
> +             .flow_control           = COROSYNC_LIB_FLOW_CONTROL_REQUIRED
>       },
>       { /* 15 */
>               .lib_handler_fn         = 
> message_handler_req_lib_ckpt_sectioniterationfinalize,
> -             .flow_control           = COROSYNC_LIB_FLOW_CONTROL_NOT_REQUIRED
> +             .flow_control           = COROSYNC_LIB_FLOW_CONTROL_REQUIRED
>       },
>       { /* 16 */
>               .lib_handler_fn         = 
> message_handler_req_lib_ckpt_sectioniterationnext,
> -             .flow_control           = COROSYNC_LIB_FLOW_CONTROL_NOT_REQUIRED
> +             .flow_control           = COROSYNC_LIB_FLOW_CONTROL_REQUIRED
>       }
>  };
>  

> _______________________________________________
> Openais mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to