On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Jan Friesse <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrew, > Trunk is definitively usable. But one problem is, that shutdown can end > with segfault.
Which doesn't really help test this :-( > > qemu-img should be able to create qcow2 compressed image from LVM. Before I send across huge images, does this look right? # qemu-img create -b /dev/System/pcmk-1 qcow2 pcmk-1.qcow2 Where LV Name /dev/System/pcmk-1 VG Name System LV UUID RC3wZT-YcWY-b8vo-d57L-im93-Q9na-OBkuQL LV Write Access read/write LV snapshot status active destination for /dev/System/pcmk-0 LV Status available > Regards, > Honza > > Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:12 PM, Jan Friesse wrote: >> >>> Andrew, >>> this is definitively bad and shouldn't ever happened (correct corosync >>> shutdown ends with Corosync Cluster Engine exiting with status -1 at >>> main.c:162). Sadly, I'm not able to reproduce what you describe on one >>> node with: >>> - Fedora12 >>> - pacemaker from Fedora repository (no configuration, just added service >>> to corosync) >>> - Corosync trunk + my patch >>> >>> Can you please send my your configuration of Pacemaker (or better full >>> configuration of what you are using). >> >> Attached. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> >>> Or even better, do you think it is >>> possible to store somewhere VM (ideally compressed qcow2) with your >>> installation? >> >> I'm using lvm snapshots which probably aren't as conducive to transport. >> >> Before we go down that path though, is trunk usable without your patch? >> It may be that the logging behavior is an unrelated issue with trunk. >> >> >> >>> Regards, >>> Honza >>> >>> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Jan Friesse <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>>>>>> Can you describe what it does please. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Should ensure, that: >>>>>> - Service exit_fn is called before exit >>>>>> - all IPC using service is disconnected and wait to proper end of IPC >>>>>> thread >>>>>> - service is correctly unlinked >>>>>> >>>>>> But what I think that Steve wants is to test, if pacemaker works >>>>>> correctly with this patch. >>>>> Yeah, but it helps to know what one is testing in order to know how >>>>> best to test it. >>>>> Running with trunk + your new patch now... >>>> Should logging be affected? >>>> I'm frequently seeing nothing at all from corosync after >>>> >>>> Jan 27 12:56:04 pcmk-4 corosync[1878]: [pcmk ] notice: >>>> pcmk_shutdown: Shutdown complete >>>> Jan 27 12:56:04 pcmk-4 corosync[1878]: [SERV ] Service engine >>>> unloaded: Pacemaker Cluster Manager 1.1.0 >>>> >>>> There's no cores (ulimit -c is set to unlimited) and the processes are >>>> gone, so its unclear if there is a problem. >> >> -- Andrew >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
