On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 15:15 -0700, hj lee wrote: > Hi, > > In passive rrp mode, the faulty ring ring can be set by either > passive_mcast-recv() or passive_token_recv(). I think one of two can > be removed. Since token is circulated more frequently, usually > passive_token_recv() will set ring to faulty. Having two does not hurt > much, but there is no reason to have not useful code. > > Will it be a problem if faulty detection by passive_mcast_recv() is > removed? >
I don't know the answer to your question without significant investigation. I plan to investigate making redundant ring more usable once we have our current list of bugs worked out. Regards -steve > Thanks > hj > > -- > Peakpoint Service > > Cluster Setup, Troubleshooting & Development > [email protected] > (303) 997-2823 > _______________________________________________ > Openais mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
