On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Andreas Mock <[email protected]> wrote: > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Andrew Beekhof <[email protected]> > Gesendet: 23.03.2010 16:35:01 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Openais] Strange behaviour of corosync > >>> Andrew really did all the work on the init script so he should comment. >>> I believe it is designed to allow pacemaker to shutdown in an orderly >>> fashion as to not stonith the node (which may happen with a kill -9). >> >>Correct. kill -9 == bad. > > IMHO my proposal was a little bit more differentiated. > Besides "kill -9 == bad" I don't see a reason after sending > a kill -TERM and waiting for seconds/minutes or whatever amount of time > not to send a finite kill -9 to corosync.
Because the amount of time is determined by whatever resources you're running. Someone with a couple of IPs needs only seconds but someone with a dozen thumping big databases might need hours. So almost certainly any chosen period of time will be completely wrong. > Because something has gone wrong if corosync is not able to > stop properly. Am I wrong? Yes. Sorry. _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
