Hi,
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04095.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04202.html
You wrote:
> Another question: I am using a wireshark packet dissector for corosync
> totem protocol downloaded from internet, that was very useful tool!
Thank you.
> But I found a few issues, is the original creator(from redhat) still
> maintaining that?
I'm maintainer of "wireshark dissector for corosync" patch. I'm sorry
that I could not response your post about my patch. I was busy at
that time. I'm revising my patch to merge it to wireshark official
source tree now.
> It's very minor patch to initialize encapsulated to 0 in hold_cancel
> message. Without this patch, encapsulated byte has a garbage byte that makes
> wireshark dissector fail.
Before submitting the revised patch to wireshark project, I'd like to clear
the issue you reported.
You wrote ``wireshark dissector fail''. I would like to know the detail.
My guessing is that wireshark itself runs well but corosync dissector doesn't
recognize the capture data as corosync communication; may be the data are
displayed as UDP packets.
If my guessing is wrong, could you tell me the detail? If you still have the
capture
data which make wireshark dissector fail, could you send it to me privately?
Masatake YAMATO
_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
