On 06/04/2010 07:34 AM, Alain.Moulle wrote: > Hi > > is it supported to have one of the ringnumber with a bindnetaddr linked to > an Eth bridge if (br0) ? > > because on one config, I have : > rrp_mode : active > and > for 1st ringnumber : > bindnetaddr: 12.1.0.0 > for 2nd ringnumber : > bindnetaddr: 12.0.0.0 >
I have never tried this - ie using a machine connected between two lans to act as a software network switch for one cluster. Can't say if it works or not. please give output of ifconfig. It may be that your netmask is not properly set, or that br0 is not in an up state (below ipaddr says it is an UNKNOWN state). Regards -steve > and ip addr gives : > > 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP > qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:30:48:da:89:23 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 12.1.0.3/16 brd 10.1.255.255 scope global eth1 > 4: *br0*: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state > UNKNOWN > link/ether 00:30:48:da:89:22 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 12.0.0.3/16 brd 10.0.255.255 scope global br0 > > and nodes remains UNCLEAN and seem to not exchange tokens between them. > > If I keep only the eth1 network, it works fine again. > > So is Eth Bridge supported for corosync ? > Or is it a bug fixed in a later release ? > (this config is on fc12 and with corosync-1.1.2-1) > > Thanks > Regards > Alain Moullé > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openais mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
