On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 05:35:08PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote: > On 07/15/2010 02:47 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:50:15AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote: > >> shouldn't sync_aborted() only be called if sync_processing != 0? > > > > That would be nice, but it is not acurate enough. > > > > sync_processing is set to 0 after syncv1 is done. > > Then syncv2 processing is done. If we get a config change > > after syncv1 is down, but before syncv2 is done then it won't > > get aborted. > > > > -Angus > > > > got it, then good for merge.
Committed as revision 2995. -Angus _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
