On 2010-09-13 14:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Florian Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2010-09-13 11:21, Chase Venters wrote: >>> On Monday 13 September 2010 3:45:50 am Florian Haas wrote: >>>> I realize I may be asking for a lot, but is there any chance you could >>>> rewrite your module to use SWIG, thereby making it more easily portable >>>> to languages other than Perl? >>> >>> I definitely see the value of having pieces of the corosync stack exposed to >>> more scripting languages. >>> >>> I've only glanced briefly at SWIG before. That was a few years ago. To be >>> honest I don't remember why I've tended to pass up SWIG for XS, but I'm >>> happy >>> to take another look at it SWIG when I find some time. Thankfully the CPG >>> API >>> is nice and simple which made these bindings easy to create. >>> >>> Along these same lines, I wonder what other parts of the stack would be most >>> useful to expose? I've been thinking about doing something with the >>> confdb... >> >> Are you using Pacemaker at all? If so, an object oriented wrapper around >> libcib would be high on my personal list. Probably best done as a C++ >> wrapper around the libcib C API, > > /me cries
Alternative suggestions are welcome. Beats mapping to an OO approach from each and every individual language binding if you ask me. Cheers, Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
