On 09/25/2010 11:40 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
>> This patch looks good but there are some poll apis used which are
>> available via coroapi.
>>
> Hi
>
> Yes, I have seperated out my initial patch and my subsequent work into
> the integration patch. In this patch I am using a pthread to poll for
> the stats (you were initially concerned about blocking calls). In
> my next patch I remove the pthread and change the poll_() calls to
> api->timer..() calls. If you want I can squash these into one patch.
>
> -Angus
>

Didn't notice that.  I think your patchset looks good then.

Regards
-steve


>
>> Regards
>> -steve
>>
>> On 09/23/2010 06:55 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Angus Salkeld<[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>    configure.ac                |   36 ++
>>>    corosync.spec.in            |   14 +
>>>    exec/Makefile.am            |    2 +-
>>>    exec/service.c              |   12 +
>>>    include/corosync/corodefs.h |    4 +-
>>>    services/Makefile.am        |    6 +
>>>    services/mon.c              |  635 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    services/wd.c               |  755 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    8 files changed, 1462 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 services/mon.c
>>>    create mode 100644 services/wd.c
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openais mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to