On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Jan Friesse <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would use sizeof(g_record)/sizeof(g_record[0]) too, but whole corosync
> tree is consistent in NOT using this constructions...

Yes, that's what I meant .... *cough* .... :-)

Point taken, though.  Thanks.

--
Russell
_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to