On 02/23/2011 02:03 AM, JiaQiang Xu wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm trying to configure multiple interfaces with UDPU transport. > I have several machines, each with multiple network connections. > What I want to do is to let the machines heartbeat on all available > network connections. > > Since in the current config file syntax, each interface only support one > bindnetaddr > parameter, I think I have to config multiple interfaces to let corosync > listen on > all local net ifs. > > I also found in the corosync.conf manual that I have to set rrpmode > option to > 'passive' or 'active' if I configure multiple interfaces. Which one > should I choose? > I just want my heartbeat messages more fault tolerant. > > Do I get the right way to do this? Many thanks for any suggestions. > > Thanks, > -Jiaqiang > > > redundant ring is completely untested with udpu. I would focus on getting udpu working first and go from there.
passive offers better performance, active consumes more cpu with slightly lower latency. > _______________________________________________ > Openais mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais _______________________________________________ Openais mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais
