On 03/15/2011 10:57 PM, Kashif wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>  
> 
>             I recently installed Corosync 1.3.0 in SLES11SP1 environment
> for High Availability solution using OpenAIS and Pacemaker.
> 
>  
> 
>             I see a very abnormal behavior which is completely
> unwanted.... Please Help... my scenarios are mentioned below
> 
>  
> 
>             Scenario1:
> 
>             I configure two interfaces in corosync.conf. Then i start
> Corosync to run Pacemeker.
> 
>             Now if both the interfaces goes down(first ringnumber0 and
> then ringnumber1 using iptables), then if eth for ringnumber0 is
> repaired then, Pacemaker does not detect the Node to be back online.
> Same thing happens to corosync.
> 
> 

Redundant ring needs more testing and work - possibly double failures
are not recoverable, from reading your description.  If you are using
ifdown, this will cause breakage.  Instead use iptables.


> 
>             Now if i execute "corosync-cfgtool -r", the system goes for
> a toss..... Multiple unwanted heartbeat tasks gets started which makes
> the system very slow....
> 

I would recommend running pacemaker 1.1.  pacemaker 1.0 (the plugin
model) has some problems that we are unable to solve.

>  
> 
>             Please help me on how to properly use two interface
> configuration in corosync.conf which can deal with any interface getting
> up or down and accordingly detect for both cases (whether eth for
> interface1 or interface2 is back repaired).
> 
>  

You need redundant ring automatic recovery which doesn't exist.  See
further down for how you can contribute there :).

> 
>             Also i would like to contribute to the development of
> OpenAIS/corosync. Kindly suggest as to how  
> 
>  

Read the TODO list in the source tree and pick an item to work on.

http://www.corosync.org/git/?p=corosync.git;a=blob;f=TODO;h=9a2db8ffabe9a40705ea000daadc838796093ed6;hb=HEAD

The community is happy to assist your ramp up.  Also read:

http://www.corosync.org/doku.php?id=dev:contributor_guide

One thing that people really seem to want is the completion of the
redundant ring automatic recovery patch.  I posted an initial version
which needs some tidying before it is merge-able.  The commit log
contains the list of "TODO" items in the patch.

https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-March/015848.html

> 
> Regards
> 
> KASHIF
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ***************************************************************************************
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from
> HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is
> listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way
> (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure,
> reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
> recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
> notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openais mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

_______________________________________________
Openais mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/openais

Reply via email to