> > Is this acceptable? I have no problem with this myself, as GCC 3.x is > > almost (but not quite) obsolete and we can just make it a requirement > > of the build. > GCC 4.0 was released on April 20, 2005, and GCC-3.4.x (as a release series) > was created in 2004. > Personally, I think it's OK to say for OB-2.3 that people should no longer > use GCC3.4. I believe for all platforms, if it's not the main compiler, a > package with a more recent version of GCC should be available. > Otherwise, we'll *never* allow ourselves to use features like shared_ptr.
I agree that GCC 3.x is obsolete. If some platform doesn't have a package for GCC 4, it could be compiled from sources anyway -- Regards, Konstantin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
