> Perhaps we need to distinguish between documentation for developers > and documentation for users.
I agree. This was the main reason for the wiki -- easy documentation for end-users. I hoped the wiki would allow others to fix mistakes, add docs, etc. It has been modestly successful by this criteria. One downside is that the wiki does need updating with releases, but I think it's generally good. I think the frustration comes near the end of a release cycle when we start telling some people that "the development code is good and offers new features X, Y, and Z." which aren't yet on the wiki. I believe we can continue to improve our developer documentation, which needs to be dynamically updated. I believe Noel has started doing that again. Best regards, -Geoff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
