On 10/10/2011 14:57, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: > I usually try to be very careful when merging in changes for a "point" > release, but it seems like the InChI 1.0.4 release is incredibly minor (i.e., > not like 1.0.2 -> 1.0.3). > > What are people's thoughts about merging in InChI-1.0.4 for the upcoming > 2.3.1 release. If we don't merge it now, I'd suggest releasing 2.3.2 in 6-8 > weeks with the upgraded InChI and any additional bug fixes.
I would prefer not to include InChI-1.0.4 in 2.3.1 and instead have it in 2.3.2 in a few weeks. Although it looks a very minor upgrade, it will require some checking; there are other things to look at before 2.3.1; and a later bug release, which we have had before, can be reassuring. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ OpenBabel-Devel mailing list OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel
