On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 08:31:11PM +0100, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
> On 6 October 2012 20:08, Reinis Danne <rei4...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:32:11PM -0400, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote:
> >> If there are other changes or fixes on trunk that you'd like to see 
> >> resolved, speak now.
> >
> > After discussion on ob-discuss I just committed r5034 (improve
> > bond peception to sulfur compounds) to trunk. If possible it
> > would be great that it is still included in this release.
> 
> It might be a good idea to test this patch against a large dataset to
> ensure that it does not introduce any problems.

What do you mean by large dataset? I have tested it with at
least one compound for each pattern and OB tests are passing
with no complaints. It is not readily comparable since the
previous behaviour was completely broken for all but sulfones. I
consider this change to be specific enough (SO containing
functional groups) to be safe.

If you have concrete tests in mind, I can run them, but as the
main result of such an exercise I see only discovering bugs for
other functional groups.


Reinis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-Devel mailing list
OpenBabel-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-devel

Reply via email to