I was going to say that this has been fixed in the development
version, but the dev version doesn't appear to have any stereobonds.

Any idea what's going on here Chris?

- Noel

On 8 May 2011 23:00, dave.nunn <david.s.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm running on Mac OSX 10.6.7, obabel version: Open Babel 2.3.0 -- Apr 27
> 2011 -- 22:43:21
>
> obabel -:'OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O)[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@@H]1O)O)O' -O tmp.svg
> open tmp.svg
>
> When you look at the output, the wedges all run backwards to the standard
> convention? I.e., the pointy end of the wedge should be on carbon (the
> center with marked stereochemistry) not on the hydrogens? The information in
> SD file format looks correct from:
> obabel -:'OC[C@H]1O[C@H](O)[C@@H]([C@@H]([C@@H]1O)O)O' -O tmp.sdf --gen2d
> -xw
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://forums.openbabel.org/Wedges-backwards-in-svg-tp3507898p3507898.html
> Sent from the General discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
> management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial
> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
> _______________________________________________
> OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
> OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to