First of - congratulations on the paper! This gives us a way to give OB
developers their due by citing the publication.
I have found a few examples of Substances from Pubchem where OB 2.3.0
gives segfault - my guess is due to the presence of a dummy atom - e.g.
6361218
-OEChem-04171109372D
2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0999 V2000
-1.1666 0.0418 0.0000 * 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.3726 0.0929 0.0000 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A 1
R
M CHG 1 1 1
M END
This particular molecule is SID 16361218.
While those are not real "molecules" the segfaults are quite unpleasant,
especially if it's one structure out of a big file of otherwise good
molecules. Has this been fixed already in the svn somewhere? I can share
a set of 5398 such structures from Pubchem substances.
Would it be possible to get the segfaults out of the way before 2.3.1
release?
Best regards,
Igor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
