El mié, 22-02-2012 a las 11:16 -0500, Geoffrey Hutchison escribió:
> > Im asking because I am using CDK and OpenBabel, and I am suffering of
> > interoperability problems, because both tools have different ways of
> > defining aromaticity.
> 
> There is no unified aromaticity model in chemistry. I'm not sure the 
> aromaticity algorithm in Open Babel is publishable, and even if it were, 
> there are numerous special cases. We have made sure in the 2.3.x release, 
> that we can round-trip PubChem and ZINC, including appropriate SMILES 
> strings. This requires a fairly liberal aromaticity model.
> 

Hello. Aromaticity is in fact a very tricky issue. As I have pointed out
in previous messages, openbabel does not behave well when aromaticity
and metal atoms appear in the same compound. Metal complexes with
pyridine-like ligands are completely messed up by openbabel, breaking
aromaticity, with lots of spurious H-atoms appearing. Also ferrocene and
friends are regarded as non-aromatic, of course any organometallic
chemist will say that ferrocene is indeed an aromatic compound with
aromatic properties. See:

obabel -:"[Cu]([n]1ccccc1)([n]1ccccc1)(Cl)Cl" -osmi
[Cu](N1CCCCC1)(N1CCCCC1)(Cl)Cl  
1 molecule converted

obabel
-:"[Fe]12345678([cH]9[cH]1[cH]2[cH]3[cH]49)[cH]1[cH]5[cH]6[cH]7[cH]81"
-osmi
[Fe]12345678(C9C1C2C3C49)C1C5C6C7C81    
1 molecule converted

Best wishes,
Miguel Quirós

-- 
Miguel Quirós Olozábal
Departamento de Química Inorgánica. Facultad de Ciencias.
Universidad de Granada. 18071 Granada. SPAIN.
email: mquiros<at>ugr<dot>es
       mquiros<arroba>ugr<punto>es


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to