If you check the log (see History at that link)...on May 16 2013:
"Changed cifformat.cpp to output fractional coordinates" by Ronald
Cohen. It would have been nice to have a option to support both maybe?

So it's in the dev version if you want to compile it yourself...

- Noel

On 13 August 2013 16:02, Patrick Fuller <patrickful...@gmail.com> wrote:
> :-(
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Patrick Fuller <patrickful...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've noticed that cycling cif files through obabel does not preserve
>> fractional coordinates. Namely, if I run
>>
>> obabel CoMOF74.cif -O cycled.cif
>>
>> the output coordinates are cartesian. The source reads like it should
>> output fractional, but I can't figure out how to get that behavior working.
>> Can anyone help?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Pat
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
> It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
> Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead.
> Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
> OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to