That seems to have done the trick. Many thanks, my friend!

Wallace

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Fredrik Wallner <fred...@wallner.nu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I tried to convert your molecule to SMILES to see what was happening and
> it seems like the problem is not so much that it is a radical as it is a
> problem with that specific line. According to the error message when trying
> to make a smiles string, you can only have 8 entries in an M  RAD line, so
> splitting the line into two separate lines seems to fix the problem.
>
>
>  CID 10832764
>
>  45 45  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0999 V2000
>    -4.5473   -1.4088   -2.6901 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -5.4165   -2.0450   -2.8690 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    -4.6254    0.0247   -3.0188 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -5.5532    0.4285   -3.4297 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    -3.9299    0.7720   -1.9589 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -4.3347    1.7254   -1.6153 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    -3.4341   -0.1985   -0.9724 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -3.4572    0.0472    0.0898 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    -3.8044   -1.5461   -1.4275 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -4.1150   -2.2930   -0.6952 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    10.1118   -0.1072   -1.0531 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    11.0116   -0.6217   -0.7437 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    10.0099    1.3551   -1.0301 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    10.8334    1.9806   -0.7129 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     8.6134    1.7095   -0.7671 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     8.3349    2.6288   -0.2730 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     7.8586    0.4655   -0.6399 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     8.7768   -0.6591   -0.8155 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     8.6212   -1.6267   -0.3600 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     6.4109    0.3622   -0.3525 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     6.2081   -0.3220    0.8999 N   0  0  0  0  0
>     5.0616   -0.9415    1.2841 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     4.9460   -1.4962    2.3676 O   0  0  0  0  0
>     4.0816   -0.8758    0.3425 O   0  0  0  0  0
>     2.9168   -1.6591    0.6263 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     1.9117   -0.9082    1.4997 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     1.5241    0.4760    0.9757 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     0.8664    0.4639   -0.3691 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -0.0280   -0.3898   -0.9697 C   0  0  0  0  0
>    -0.3686    0.0491   -2.2444 N   0  0  0  0  0
>     0.3555    1.1482   -2.4053 C   0  0  0  0  0
>     1.1066    1.4426   -1.2968 N   0  0  0  0  0
>    -1.9075   -0.6661   -3.2877 Fe  0  0  0  0  0
>     5.9025   -0.1765   -1.1593 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     5.9468    1.3505   -0.2651 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     6.9424   -0.3114    1.5971 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     3.1893   -2.6172    1.0856 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     2.4654   -1.9092   -0.3396 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     2.3423   -0.7703    2.4989 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     1.0173   -1.5298    1.6277 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     2.4109    1.1211    0.9522 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     0.8270    0.9356    1.6883 H   0  0  0  0  0
>    -0.4327   -1.2943   -0.5237 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     0.4027    1.7914   -3.2787 H   0  0  0  0  0
>     1.7344    2.2340   -1.1840 H   0  0  0  0  0
>   1  9  1  0  0  0
>   1  3  1  0  0  0
>   1  2  1  0  0  0
>   3  5  1  0  0  0
>   3  4  1  0  0  0
>   5  7  1  0  0  0
>   5  6  1  0  0  0
>   7  9  1  0  0  0
>   7  8  1  0  0  0
>   9 10  1  0  0  0
>  11 18  1  0  0  0
>  11 13  1  0  0  0
>  11 12  1  0  0  0
>  13 15  1  0  0  0
>  13 14  1  0  0  0
>  15 17  1  0  0  0
>  15 16  1  0  0  0
>  17 18  1  0  0  0
>  17 20  1  0  0  0
>  18 19  1  0  0  0
>  20 21  1  0  0  0
>  20 34  1  0  0  0
>  20 35  1  0  0  0
>  21 22  1  0  0  0
>  21 36  1  0  0  0
>  22 24  1  0  0  0
>  22 23  2  0  0  0
>  24 25  1  0  0  0
>  25 26  1  0  0  0
>  25 37  1  0  0  0
>  25 38  1  0  0  0
>  26 27  1  0  0  0
>  26 39  1  0  0  0
>  26 40  1  0  0  0
>  27 28  1  0  0  0
>  27 41  1  0  0  0
>  27 42  1  0  0  0
>  28 29  2  0  0  0
>  28 32  1  0  0  0
>  29 30  1  0  0  0
>  29 43  1  0  0  0
>  30 31  2  0  0  0
>  31 32  1  0  0  0
>  31 44  1  0  0  0
>  32 45  1  0  0  0
> M  RAD  8   1   2   3   2   5   2   7   2   9   2  11   2  13   2  15   2
> M  RAD  2  17   2  18   2
> M  CHG  1  33   2
> M  END
>
> Kind regards,
> Fredrik
>
> 2 nov. 2015 kl. 16:03 skrev Wallace Chan <walla...@umich.edu>:
>
> Noel,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I seem to have found the issue. The following
> molecule (in SDF format) appears to be the problem:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *CID 10832764 45 45  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0999 V2000   -4.5473   -1.4088
> -2.6901 C   0  0  0  0  0   -5.4165   -2.0450   -2.8690 H   0  0  0  0  0
> -4.6254    0.0247   -3.0188 C   0  0  0  0  0   -5.5532    0.4285   -3.4297
> H   0  0  0  0  0   -3.9299    0.7720   -1.9589 C   0  0  0  0  0
> -4.3347    1.7254   -1.6153 H   0  0  0  0  0   -3.4341   -0.1985   -0.9724
> C   0  0  0  0  0   -3.4572    0.0472    0.0898 H   0  0  0  0  0
> -3.8044   -1.5461   -1.4275 C   0  0  0  0  0   -4.1150   -2.2930   -0.6952
> H   0  0  0  0  0   10.1118   -0.1072   -1.0531 C   0  0  0  0  0
> 11.0116   -0.6217   -0.7437 H   0  0  0  0  0   10.0099    1.3551   -1.0301
> C   0  0  0  0  0   10.8334    1.9806   -0.7129 H   0  0  0  0  0
> 8.6134    1.7095   -0.7671 C   0  0  0  0  0    8.3349    2.6288   -0.2730
> H   0  0  0  0  0    7.8586    0.4655   -0.6399 C   0  0  0  0  0
> 8.7768   -0.6591   -0.8155 C   0  0  0  0  0    8.6212   -1.6267   -0.3600
> H   0  0  0  0  0    6.4109    0.3622   -0.3525 C   0  0  0  0  0
> 6.2081   -0.3220    0.8999 N   0  0  0  0  0    5.0616   -0.9415    1.2841
> C   0  0  0  0  0    4.9460   -1.4962    2.3676 O   0  0  0  0  0
> 4.0816   -0.8758    0.3425 O   0  0  0  0  0    2.9168   -1.6591    0.6263
> C   0  0  0  0  0    1.9117   -0.9082    1.4997 C   0  0  0  0  0
> 1.5241    0.4760    0.9757 C   0  0  0  0  0    0.8664    0.4639   -0.3691
> C   0  0  0  0  0   -0.0280   -0.3898   -0.9697 C   0  0  0  0  0
> -0.3686    0.0491   -2.2444 N   0  0  0  0  0    0.3555    1.1482   -2.4053
> C   0  0  0  0  0    1.1066    1.4426   -1.2968 N   0  0  0  0  0
> -1.9075   -0.6661   -3.2877 Fe  0  0  0  0  0    5.9025   -0.1765   -1.1593
> H   0  0  0  0  0    5.9468    1.3505   -0.2651 H   0  0  0  0  0
> 6.9424   -0.3114    1.5971 H   0  0  0  0  0    3.1893   -2.6172    1.0856
> H   0  0  0  0  0    2.4654   -1.9092   -0.3396 H   0  0  0  0  0
> 2.3423   -0.7703    2.4989 H   0  0  0  0  0    1.0173   -1.5298    1.6277
> H   0  0  0  0  0    2.4109    1.1211    0.9522 H   0  0  0  0  0
> 0.8270    0.9356    1.6883 H   0  0  0  0  0   -0.4327   -1.2943   -0.5237
> H   0  0  0  0  0    0.4027    1.7914   -3.2787 H   0  0  0  0  0
> 1.7344    2.2340   -1.1840 H   0  0  0  0  0  1  9  1  0  0  0  1  3  1  0
> 0  0  1  2  1  0  0  0  3  5  1  0  0  0  3  4  1  0  0  0  5  7  1  0  0
> 0  5  6  1  0  0  0  7  9  1  0  0  0  7  8  1  0  0  0  9 10  1  0  0
> 0 11 18  1  0  0  0 11 13  1  0  0  0 11 12  1  0  0  0 13 15  1  0  0
> 0 13 14  1  0  0  0 15 17  1  0  0  0 15 16  1  0  0  0 17 18  1  0  0
> 0 17 20  1  0  0  0 18 19  1  0  0  0 20 21  1  0  0  0 20 34  1  0  0
> 0 20 35  1  0  0  0 21 22  1  0  0  0 21 36  1  0  0  0 22 24  1  0  0
> 0 22 23  2  0  0  0 24 25  1  0  0  0 25 26  1  0  0  0 25 37  1  0  0
> 0 25 38  1  0  0  0 26 27  1  0  0  0 26 39  1  0  0  0 26 40  1  0  0
> 0 27 28  1  0  0  0 27 41  1  0  0  0 27 42  1  0  0  0 28 29  2  0  0
> 0 28 32  1  0  0  0 29 30  1  0  0  0 29 43  1  0  0  0 30 31  2  0  0
> 0 31 32  1  0  0  0 31 44  1  0  0  0 32 45  1  0  0  0M  RAD 10   1   2
> 3   2   5   2   7   2   9   2  11   2  13   2  15   2  17   2  18   2M
> CHG  1  33   2M  END*
>
> When I try to make a fastsearch index with this molecule, I get the
> following error:
>
> *babel file.sdf -ofs*
> *==============================*
> **** Open Babel Error  in ReadMolecule*
> *  Error in line:*
> *M  RAD 10   1   2   3   2   5   2   7   2   9   2  11   2  13   2  15
> 2  17   2  18   2*
> *0 molecules converted*
> *1 errors 2 audit log messages *
>
> Seems to be a problem with the molecule being a radical.
>
>
> Wallace
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Noel O'Boyle <baoille...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Convert to smi and figure out which molecules are missing.
>>
>> - Noel
>>
>> On 28 October 2015 at 18:36, Wallace Chan <walla...@umich.edu> wrote:
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > I am having trouble with creating a fast search index. My command and
>> output
>> > are as follows:
>> >
>> > Command
>> > babel glass.sdf -ofs
>> >
>> > Output
>> > This will prepare an index of glass.sdf and may take some time...
>> >  It took 55 seconds
>> > 41258 molecules converted
>> > 15 audit log messages
>> >
>> > The problem lies in the fact that glass.sdf has 186,342 molecules, while
>> > only
>> > 41,258 molecules succeeded in being converted. This is puzzling because
>> this
>> > has always worked for me in the past. I speculated that I may have
>> messed up
>> > the dollar sign formatting in molecule separation, but upon inspection,
>> the
>> > format seems fine.
>> >
>> > This has been driving me crazy and any help given will be much
>> appreciated.
>> > Thanks!
>> >
>> > --
>> > Wallace Chan
>> > PhD Candidate
>> > Zhang Lab
>> > Department of Biological Chemistry
>> > University of Michigan
>> > walla...@umich.edu
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
>> > OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Wallace Chan
> PhD Candidate
> Zhang Lab
> Department of Biological Chemistry
> University of Michigan
> walla...@umich.edu
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
> OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
>
>
>


-- 
Wallace Chan
PhD Candidate
Zhang Lab
Department of Biological Chemistry
University of Michigan
walla...@umich.edu
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to