Sean, just to let you know where we are with this. The empty prefix is something we could support, but the problem we hit was that, you had to provide an implementation for *every* tag it encountered otherwise it would say "tag not found".
This isn't ideal I appreciate. We've got a number of other things on the list to do, but we'll take a swing back at this very soon. If you want to open up a bug ticket for it so it doesn't fall off the radar then feel free to do so. thanks Sean Corfield wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Alan Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey Sean ... so it looks like the emptry prefix isn't being recognized >> on OpenBD (or Railo). > > Yup, that's what I figured. I suspect the parser isn't set up to treat > <notacftag> as a potential custom tag call? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
