I've encountered the version issue with some Fusebox distro's. It checks to decide which fbx_fusebox... file to include, based on the value of server.coldfusion.productVersion. Because the value in OpenBD is 1.0 - the logic falls through through to the default, assuming the platform to be CF 4.0
Not sure where I'm going here. CF and OpenBD are two different sets of code with two legitimately different versions. The variable is technically correct. Perhaps the value of server.coldfusion.productVersion should reflect the most accurate representation of the bona fide CF version; and there should be a separate variable server.openbd.productVersion to hold the true BD version? Or should there be another variable called server.coldfusion.cfCompatableVersion, for developers to leverage as needed? Now there's a whole new discussion on what number to use here for partial feature matches... like should 1.0 convert to 7.5 or something like that? Or just leave it be. Developers should contrive their own workarounds for every application they build or extend? Brain hurt. Al Matthew Woodward wrote: > Raymond Camden wrote: >> I am a complete and utter idiot. I forgot blog.cfc itself also does a >> quick version check. DOH! >> > > Heh--so everything's squared away now? I should have mentioned I did > have to comment out 2 blocks of version checking code. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
