Just to get the conversation started, what do you think of these cfproperty
annotations for gae:
<!--- *Post.cfc* --->
<cfcomponent dbtype="google" dbname="Post" output="false">
<!---* Title* in string format and persisted to google as defined by
dbtype. --->
<cfproperty name="Title" dbtype="google" type="string" />
<!---* **CreationDate* persisted to google under a different name
"DateCreated" --->
<cfproperty name="CreationDate" dbname="DateCreated" dbtype="google"
type="date" />
<!---* **Comments *will be an array of "comment" objects. This is
evident because "type" is set to the non-standard "comment" and therefore
tells OpenBD that this is a relationship to an object. The real type at the
end will be an array. --->
<cfproperty name="Comments" dbtype="google" type="Comment" />
<!---* **CalculatedField* will not be stored in google because it
does not specify dbtype="google" --->
<cfproperty name="CalculatedField" type="Numeric" />
</cfcomponent>
<!--- *Comment.cfc* has a relationship defined in Post.cfc --->
<cfcomponent dbname="Comment" dbtype="google" output="false">
<cfproperty name="CommentText" dbtype="google" type="string" />
<cfproperty name="DateCreated" dbtype="google" type="date" />
</cfcomponent>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/
!! save a network - trim replies before posting !!
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
