On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:11:49 -0500, Jason King <[email protected]> wrote: > Another question. How reliant is lucene with session state, etc.. ??
Not sure what you're asking here. > Is it possible that, along with web servers running openBD to process the > cfm and database servers, I could deploy an openbd server explicitly for > lucene searches? Absolutely--this is one of the great things about all this stuff being open source. You can deploy where needed as needed and only use what you need without having to pay for a license only to use a subset of the features available. > so that when www1 is running code that performs a search, it connects to > server 'search1' to actually process the search, and then return the > results > to www1? Sure, you could do this several different ways, with a plain old CFHTTP call being the most straight-forward. > This would be ideal, because I could deploy these search servers on Linux, > so the whole thing would be free to deploy. This would allow me to take the > load off of the www1 servers (which are actually managing session state) > and > the database servers. Now you're thinking. :-) -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://mpwoodward.posterous.com identi.ca/Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en official site @ http://www.openbluedragon.org/ !! save a network - trim replies before posting !! -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
