1. The package name of the class was changed from: com.newatlanta.commons.vfs.provider.gae.GaeVfsServletEventListener to com.newatlanta.appengine.servlet.GaeVfsServletEventListener
However the web.xml that ships with the distribution was (mistakely) not updated to reflect this change. I just checked-in an updated web.xml. So the next build will include that change. In the meantime just edit yours to refer to the new package name. 2. I enabled the SearchEngineFriendlyURLFilter on purpose since my current effort of running Commercial BlueDragon's suite of Regression tests against OpenBD-Google revealed it was needed for some tests to pass. It also revealed a bug in that Filter code which I fixed and checked-in some weeks ago (improved stability of that Filter). Enabling it adds only a tiny bit of overhead in exchange for making OpenBD more bulletproof. Is there a specific reason to turn it off? Is it causing a problem for you? 3. The CachingDatastoreService is used by GaeVFS, so it must always be enabled. 4. I don't know about the timing of a point release, but as for improving the stability of OpenBD... I am currently working to get Commercial BD's suite of regression tests running (and passing) on OpenBD. Tandem to that I'll also be merging the OpenBD-GAE branch with OpenBD. The results should be improved stability of OpenBD. Matt McGinty NAC On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:37 AM, atomi <[email protected]> wrote: > So I just downladed the latest nightly release for GAE, and I have > some concerns about the current configuration: > > * There is no library with the listener class: > GaeVfsServletEventListener in the distribution. > * The web.xml (unintentionally?) enables the > SearchEngineFriendlyURLFilter as default. > * There is no way to disable the watchDog process if > CachingDatastoreService is not being used. > > As an aside I wanted to mention how I was really looking forward to a > point release in the near future for sanity. In my opinion, a stable > and speedy OpenBD should be first and foremost if it's to succeed as a > viable alternative platform for app engine.I think the initial aim for > OpenBD on GAE was centered around portability. But, I know how > rewarding and beneficial new features can be. So yes of course, I > think New Atlanta is doing a tremendous job with OpenBD for GAE and I > have no doubt everything relevant is under consideration as future > releases are planned out. Thanks. > > By the way, could someone hint on when a point release might be available? > > -- > Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List > http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en > > !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !! >
-- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en !! save a network - please trim replies before posting !!
