So I've been diving into Semantic Web stuff recently. Aggregating the
content into a central place (like cfQuickDocs) would be a lot easier if we
picked up something like RDF and ran with it. If each engine just published
their docs with RDF in there a site like cfQuickDocs could merge/manage the
data much better and help show compatibility issues.


Adam


On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Sean Corfield <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Given this, it seems completely natural to me that the other engines
> (Railo
> > would fall into this camp as well) would document differences and
> > enhancements as opposed to writing ground-up documentation.
>
> I agree. Most Railo users even tell us that they'd continue to use
> cfQuickDocs or even the Adobe online docs even if we had everything
> fully documented... I think part of that mentality is an expectation
> of compatibility and therefore Adobe's docs are de facto the baseline.
>
> > That being said, as we've moved forward on OpenBD it makes more and more
> > sense for us to generate our own documentation for numerous reasons, and
> the
> > addition of documenting straight from the engine is a huge step forward
> on
> > ensuring that the docs are always up to date.
>
> That's also the approach Railo has been taking (for the same reason).
> In our web administrator, we have tag/function documentation that
> comes straight out of the code base. We are continuing to look at ways
> to use it to seed the wiki as well (so users can comment on and
> enhance the baseline generated docs).
>
> But, as Alan and Matt observed, the primary focus for us - OpenBD and
> Railo - really has to be on the engine itself, rather than working to
> replicate all the work the Adobe documentation team does :)
> --
> Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
> Railo Technologies, Inc. -- http://getrailo.com/
> An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
> --
> Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
>  http://www.openbluedragon.org/   http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
>  online manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/
>
>  mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
>

-- 
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
 http://www.openbluedragon.org/   http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
 online manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/

 mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

Reply via email to