Can you do me a favor and file a ticket for this here? http://code.google.com/p/openbluedragon/issues/entry
As I always say to the Mach-II folk, if it's not in the ticket tracker -- it will be forgotten. .pjf Adam Cameron said the following on 08/14/2010 09:47 AM: > G'day > Consider this code: > > <!--- caller.cfm ---> > <cf_outer> > <cf_inner> > </cf_outer> > > <!--- outer.cfm ---> > <cfif thistag.executionmode eq "end"> > <cfdump var="#thistag#"> > </cfif> > > <!--- inner.cfm ---> > <cfassociate basetag="cf_outer" datacollection="subtags.inner"> > > In CF, outer.cfm's thistag struct ends up with a key "subtags", which > is a struct containing a key "inner". > > On OBD, thistag just has a key "subtags.inner". > > Note: the version of Railo I have also does it the same way as OBD. > > I can see arguments both ways, and I certainly find CF's approach more > handy for what I'm doing right now. Although it's no great shakes for > me to refactor how I'm doing things, I s'pose. I still - like the > broken record I am in this regard - there's something to be said for > doing it the same way as the precedent set by CF. > > Anyway, just thought I'd make the observation. > > Cheers. > > -- > Adam > > -- Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List http://www.openbluedragon.org/ http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon official manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/ Ready2Run CFML http://www.openbluedragon.org/openbdjam/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
