Another thing, is that this script (and possibly a few others) will be
hitting this datasource hard.

Does the XML functionality that OpenBD has offer any processing efficiency
advantages? Or is it simply there to make it easier to search/use xml docs?

Obviously, the smaller the datasource, the less memory it takes, and the
less verbose, the less characters to scan and less data to seek for results.

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jason King <[email protected]> wrote:

> here is what CSV looks like. Obviously the least verbose. no element labels
>
> phish_id,url,phish_detail_url,submission_time,verified,verification_time,online,target
> 123456,http://www.example.com/,http://www.phishtank.com/phish_detail.php?phish_id=123456,2009-06-19T15:15:47+00:00,yes,2009-06-19T15:37:31+00:00,yes,1st
>  National Example Bank
>
>

-- 
Open BlueDragon Public Mailing List
 http://www.openbluedragon.org/   http://twitter.com/OpenBlueDragon
 official manual: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/
 Ready2Run CFML http://www.openbluedragon.org/openbdjam/

 mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

Reply via email to