Not "completely" different. We--New Atlanta--are currently in the process of merging selected features and bug fixes from OpenBD into the next commercial BlueDragon release. Merging to BD.NET is a little tricky now that it's on a C# codebase (but still easily recognizable as a derivative of the original tagServlet Java code), but the Java merge is fairly straightforward.
(BTW, please let me know if there are any specific features in OpenBD that you'd like to see in the next commercial BlueDragon release). New Atlanta has not added any features to the Java editions of BlueDragon that weren't first implemented in OpenBD--the GAE work being the prime example. As we stated when "open source BlueDragon" was originally announced, OpenBD is our primary vehicle for new feature development for BlueDragon (for the Java editions). On Feb 7, 3:38 am, Alan Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > > No, aw2.0 does not provide a commercial version. New Atlanta provides > commercial versions for J2EE and .NET. These are completely separate > code branches from the OpenBD branch, and by-in-large, completely > separate products. > -- tag/function ref: http://www.openbluedragon.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en Get to Texas in Feb for OpenCFSummit http://www.opencfsummit.org/
