On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Mats Stromberg <[email protected]>wrote:
> it would have been nice if it would have > worked the other way too though... Probably less "wonky" to get the > rest of the code implemented. > Not the reason it's a pain (at least in my opinion) but feel free to experiment. The reasons jsch is a pain from my perspective are: A) no javadocs B) their examples are all GUI examples and they do weird inner class stuff even for logging in C) I created a Java project in Eclipse and started messing with things and the classes don't behave as they outline in their samples. Regarding C, I don't know if they've changed their API but with the jsch jar in a project in Eclipse, code samples like this didn't work for me: http://sthen.blogspot.com/2008/03/sftp-i-java-with-jsch-using-private-key.html Even seemingly basic stuff like jsch.getSession("user", "host", 22) was "wrong" according to Eclipse. In short, javadocs would be nice (maybe I'm just not seeing them on their site). As always I'm happy to be proven wrong. Was just way more of a headache than I thought it should be so I decided to burn my time trying the other method. > I will now try to play around with both versions for a while. > In Den's code sample there was a notice about closing the filemanager > wich could?? explain your problem Matthew with your test on the second > run. > That's what the link I shared was for: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/SimpleSftpFileDownload It was late by the time I hit that so I didn't dig into it further. They outline a different way of closing connections that's supposed to fix the "unknown scheme" error. -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
