Oracle is an odd duck so don't equate anything oracle related with sql server.
As Peter suggested you'll have to post some code but the drivers are definitely different. As an aside I tended to use the jtds driver even when I was on adobe cf because I found the performance to be better overall. On Apr 9, 2011 3:15 PM, "David Kanter" <[email protected]> wrote: > In the process of getting a development version of my website up, I > ran into a very strange problem with BD/SQL Server. What's unusual is > that it doesn't happen in the production instance of my site, which > runs with Adobe CF/SQL Server. > > Our cold fusion isn't using any tags that are problematic in terms of > compatibility, so I'm somewhat puzzled about the different results for > the different systems. In theory, everything should work equally well > under the two CFML engines. > > So I am wondering if the Adobe CFML engine has a slightly different > database connector from OpenBD. Matt Woodward had a blog post > indicating this was an issue for Oracle (http://blog.mattwoodward.com/? > tag=tomcat). Some sort of issue with the connector could at least > explain why SQL Server is complaining about the parameters we are > supplying under OpenBD, but not Adobe CF. > > Any thoughts? > > David > > -- > official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ > mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
