Yeah I came across this today actually, very annoying. Can someone explain what the benefit is of writing cfcomponents as pure script is ? What does it allow you to do that you can't with cfcomponent tag , cffunction tag and using cfscript within your function bodies ?
Reason I ask is it strikes me that often things are rewritten because we can use new functionality rather than it offering any inherent benefit ? But as i said i maybe missing the obvious. Alex On Jul 11, 6:20 pm, Sean Corfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Alan or Andy will have to confirm but I'm pretty sure script-based > > components aren't supported yet. > > Do the OpenBD team have an ETA for adding that compatibility? > > FW/1 1.x supports CFMX7 / 8 / 9, Railo 3.1 / OpenBD 1.2 (from 11/30 > on). FW/1 2.0 supports ACF9.0.1 (not 9.0), Railo 3.2. I'd like to > point folks at an OpenBD version that would support it. > -- > Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN > An Architect's View --http://corfield.org/ > World Singles, LLC. --http://worldsingles.com/ > Railo Technologies, Inc. --http://www.getrailo.com/ > > "Perfection is the enemy of the good." > -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/ mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
