Thanks for making that clear.


On Aug 3, 9:24 am, Matthew Woodward <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Magnus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Do I need to use the the 'action=commit | rollback'? Or are those
> > actions implicit when a basic cftransaction-/cftransaction pair are
> > used.
>
> They're implicit, meaning if you have something in a cftransaction block and
> no error occurs things will be committed, and if an error occurs things will
> roll back. The ability to explicitly commit and rollback is important of
> course depending on what you need to do, but it's not mandatory to use them.
>
>
>
> > Will I need to use a cftry/cfcatch block along with cftransaction to
> > make is possible to provide a message back to the user if a
> > transaction is rolled back?
>
> Basically yes, and this is what I was getting at earlier. If you want more
> fine-grained control you'd use try/catch and explicit cftransaction actions.
>
> --
> Matthew Woodward
> [email protected]http://blog.mattwoodward.com
> identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward
>
> Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint,
> etc. as attachments.http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-- 
official tag/function reference: http://openbd.org/manual/
 mailing list - http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en

Reply via email to