This is the kid of thing that makes me wish that new tags and functions introduced by competing engines were namespaced or prefixed. I've been working with OpenBD for a few years and migrated all of our ACF (v5-7) sites over without too much trouble. But now with engine-specific enhancements, I've got vendor lock if I make use of those enhancements. Worse is when two engines have a similar function with different names and slightly different functionality (e.g. OpenBD writeDump vs Railo dump). So if I find that I have a need for using another engine (e.g. Framework compatibility reasons) then I have to stop thinking about it just as CFML.
On Sunday, April 1, 2012 6:42:17 AM UTC-4, Alex Skinner wrote: > > No the issue is that OpenBluedragon has a built in function called > render() that the other two engines don't have. > > when you're calling render() its calling the built in function which takes > one argument the string you want to runtime execute. > > but the fix is correct :) > > Alex > -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
