On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Travis <[email protected]> wrote: > This > lead me to believe that Adobe basically made a wrapper over the tag > based standard version.
That's exactly what they did for many of the new script-based functionality, which is a lazy hack IMO. > So that makes me wonder... if you have to use > a wrapper over the standard way, that must mean that scripting based > implementation must be slower than tag-based standard way? > I'm not sure that's the case, the whole thing just smells bad to me regardless of any minor differences in performance, but I haven't tested any of that so I can't say for sure if there's a performance impact and how small or large it is. > > How does OpenBD go about with its scripting engine? Is there any > notable speed differences between tag/scripting styles? You'd have to define "notable." Short answer is no, it's not notable enough that you'd choose to write in script solely for speed purposes (if indeed there is any difference at all). > I haven't yet > looked but do you guys have cfstoredproc/cfquery implementations in > cfscript? > http://www.openbd.org/manual/?/function/queryrun Nothing specific to storeprocs but you could of course run the storedproc from QueryRun() via SQL. -- Matthew Woodward [email protected] http://blog.mattwoodward.com identi.ca / Twitter: @mpwoodward Please do not send me proprietary file formats such as Word, PowerPoint, etc. as attachments. http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462 http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
