Ahhh, that makes total sense. I'm going over Java OOP examples and
trying to convert them over into CFML to create more OOP tutorials for
my blog over at coldblue.net.
I guess creating polymorphic arguments would be the same convention?
It's just overriding methods. Here's an example in Java:
public class myCars {
public static void main(String[] args){
car getSpeeds = new car();
carType fCar = new m5;
carType sCar = new ferrari();
getSpeeds.speed(fCar);
getSpeeds.speed(sCar);
}
}
public class ferrari extends car {
void speed() {
System.out.println("How do I slow this thing down!");
}
}
public class m5 extends car {
void speed(){
System.out.println("I'm really speeding now!");
}
}
public class car {
public void speedCar(carType x){
x.speed();
}
}
--
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
google+ hints/tips: https://plus.google.com/115990347459711259462
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
