If the idea is to actually move the important and updated information to the OpenBD website and into the manual, I'm all for it.
On Jul 2, 6:30 am, Lewis Donofrio <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree if even the essence is stored in a manual that would be fine. > > --Thank you one and all for all you do, its you that makes the project! > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Alan Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Alex addressed it to an extent. > > > The issue is that there is too many places to keep uptodate. That is why > > Google+ was closed down. You spend more time running around all the > > outlets trying to keep them updated than you do coding! > > > If anyone has anything particular they wish to contribute to the manual, > > then just forward it to us. The manual is shipped with EVERY OpenBD > > installation, so you should never be far away from the truth > > > On 02/07/2012 05:06, Lewis Donofrio wrote: > > >> I do not think that is his point - point is why is this going away and > >> how do we get this info to stay online and accessable. > > > -- > > online documentation:http://openbd.org/manual/ > >http://groups.google.com/**group/openbd?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en> > > -- > ___________________________________________________________________ > Lewis donofrio -http://www.linkedin.com/in/donofrio- > 734-743-1743http://sites.google.com/site/thedonofriofamily/http://facebook.com/lewis.donofrio -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
