Alan,
> Life is too short to be complicating the setup with lots of unnecessary > hoops for a "perceived" performance gain that most sites don't warrant. That is definitely good advice. Is there a reason why you chose Jetty over Tomcat? Randy On Sunday, August 19, 2012 10:13:56 PM UTC-4, Alan Williamson wrote: > > i use Jetty for OpenBD. > > If i am load balancing between different backends, then it is either > nginx (if i need SSL) and haproxy for seriously high volume (10k+ > per/second). > > In todays servers ... Jetty/Tomcat will perform no noticeable > difference. If you are REALLY that concerned about CSS/JS delivery > then put them on Amazon CloudFront and be done with it. > > Life is too short to be complicating the setup with lots of unnecessary > hoops for a "perceived" performance gain that most sites don't warrant. > > > > On 19/08/2012 21:15, Randy Johnson wrote: > > Alan, > > > > You wrote: " Seems a bit complicated ... why have you put Apache infront > > of OpenBD? > > What are you hoping to do with Apache that you think Tomcat can't do for > > you?" > > > > I take it from this comment that you use tomcat to host everything and > do > > not put a front end web server in front of tomcat? > > > > I have always heard that apache, nginx did a better job at hosting > images, > > css , js etc than tomcat. > > > > I am interested in your input on this. > > > > Randy > > > > -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
