I'm flattered. I also have some old-school server space, FWIW. Like that even matters any more ;-]
The architecture (in my dream) was loosely based on some contributor model, but I imagine that some automation would be key to maintainability. For example, when a new release was published, some manner of javadoc or xml feed would be sent in... almost as part of the build process. Then some diff's are applied, yada yada... Reliance on an entirely human-based maintenance model - for something like this - seems a bit whelming. In any case, thanks for the bump Adam. Al On Friday, September 14, 2012 2:49:46 AM UTC-7, Adam Cameron wrote: > > G'day > I just thought I'd cross-post something I put on the Railo newsgroup here, > if that's OK. Just wanting to gauge what people think. The discussion is > about a cross-CFML-vendor docs project. Here's a > link<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/railo/zzW7X10Nu7Y/3J67o3Hu-0YJ>the the > initial post (by Alan Holden, not me) which got me thinking. > * > G'day > I was going to reply here but it all got a bit rambling (and > cross-platform), so I've made a blog post instead, which is over here: > http://adamcameroncoldfusion.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/improving-cfmls-documentation.html > > The bottom line is I'd be dead keen to get a common CFML documentation > project going, and did a small amount of research into it a while back. > > It could be pretty quick to get a reasonable docs repository up and > running - with baseline content - fairly quickly... > > Lemme know if this bares out further discussion (perhaps not on this > thread, as it would be a bit of a hijack). > * > I hope the cross-post is OK. Apologies if not. > > -- > Adam > -- online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/ http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
