it really depends on what you are trying to achieve. If all you are
doing is displaying cfml code then yes, your solution is indeed a way
forward doing that. However, if you have more than just a few lines of
code, then it will quickly become awkward.
glad to see you got going though
On 10/12/2014 14:32, Jason King wrote:
Yes, and that's much more code than my current solution. Is there a
reason nocfml method would be better? Am I missing anything?
<cfoutput>#HTMLEditFormat("<cfset return = "stuff">")#</cfoutput>
versus
<cfsavecontent variable="captureCfml">
<nocfml>
<cfset return = "stuff">
<cfabort>
</nocfml>
</cfsavecontent>
<cfoutput>#XmlFormat(captureCfml)#</cfoutput>
--
--
online documentation: http://openbd.org/manual/
http://groups.google.com/group/openbd?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open BlueDragon" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
