On 07/13/2010 12:42 PM, Juan Pablo Aroztegi wrote: > Thanks Dmitry, Siva. > > I think that we have to speed up this process so that it never takes > more than 24h since the build fails.
Problem here is that the api-discussion (PJU,DME,developer) changed into a discussion if the change itself is correct. As this discussion is done via mail no uptodate info was present in the issue. About the 24h i don't think this is achievable always, Just list of steps involved: - it fails - someone need to notice, if not obvious i need to analyze - report the issue - reassign to developer - developer needs to notice this - explain, reassign to PJU - PJU needs to notice and decide - <optionally> sounds rounds forth-back here - some solution needs to be done (accept,reject, etc) Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Openbravo-builds mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbravo-builds
