On 06/03/11 13:53, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On 03/06/2011 01:41 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >> >> are showing up. If those disturb I can regenerate with git-svn (my >> initial checkout of wireshark was using svn directly, sorry). > > I assume with your help we will get this merged soon, so don't bother for this > patch. The reason to have the output of git format-patch is that one could use > git am -3 in the future.
Indeed, after all this I wanted to ask you if you're OK if I proceed with the submission to wireshark ;-). Still, I think that I've got issue with a warning that spots a dissector bug. BTW, the output of the patch is in git format, so I think that you can apply it with git am. It's the inner patch (which is contained inside this patch) that it's in svn format 8-).
