Hi Pablo,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:40:08PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >> Let me know if you are OK with this approach and I'll send a
> >> patchset along this week.
> >
> > I think it's great. Once the namespace is cleaned up, I think we can head
> > for a 1.0 release of the libraries.
>
> those are good news.
>
> BTW, do you plan to maintain a stable ABI along releases for libraries?
that's the idea once we have the namespace pollution fixed and release a 1.0
> Another proposition: it may be a good idea to use some EXPORT_SYMBOL()
> macro, similar to what we use in the Linux kernel, to explicit tell what
> symbols of the library are exported.
I think it makes sense, indeed. Feel free to work on a patch, after
the namespace conversion has been done. Also, don't forget the wireshark
dissector related work (which I think is more important).
Thanks,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <[email protected]> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
