Hi David, Looks like a good idea. I just want to say that it would be better to name the list just "umts-discuss" if you aim at general discussion. This should decrease confusion of newcomers.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:53, David Burgess <[email protected]> wrote: > All - > > I realize this is slightly off topic, but I have just set up a mailing list > for discussion of the UMTS specifications. This list is not about building a > specific implementation of UMTS (although it might lead to that) but it is > instead a forum for discussion of the interpretation of the specifications. > It is my impression so far that the 3GPP documents are constructed so as to > meet some minimum legal requirement for the specification of the technology > while still avoiding the conveyance of critical information actually required > to implement the system. The likely purpose of this approach is to deter the > implementation of 3G technology by anyone outside of the set of companies > that staffed the specification committee. The eventual product of this list > could be an alternative, wikipedia-style spec that conveys all of the > information needed to actually build some minimum-but-fuctional 3G system. > Anyone who is interested breaking down the door to this club, please > subscribe here: > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-umts-discuss > > Thanks. > > -- David > > David A. Burgess > Range Networks, Inc. > 560 Brannan St. > San Francisco, CA 94107 > USA > cell +1 707 208 2622 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA(R) Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris.
